SIZE INVESTING 101: THE BASICS AND ITS ROLE IN PORTFOLIOS

• Size investing targets smaller and, generally, more nimble companies.
• Investing in low size is empirically and economically supported and can be easily accessed through low-cost ETFs.
• There are various ways to target the small size premium – including investing in style box, factors (which target the premium directly), small caps or equal weighting the broad market.

Size investing is an investment strategy that targets companies that are relatively smaller than their peers. Size investing has been around for decades. One of the most seminal pieces on investing in the small cap premium was from Rolf Banz in where he found smaller cap companies outperformed their large cap peers.¹

Size investing is based on the belief that smaller companies have the potential to outperform their large cap peers. This article will delve into what size investing is, how investors can capture the size premium, the characteristics of size portfolios, as well as why we expect the size premium to persist over time.

Size investing is a strategy that targets companies based on their market capitalization (market cap). The market cap of a company is the aggregate value of the shares of a company (shares outstanding times price). Historically, companies have been broken down into four market cap categories. They are typically mentioned as large, mid, small, and micro.

There are multiple theories as to why small cap companies have, and are expected to outperform. The most intuitive is the cost of capital argument. Imagine you’re looking to start your own business and go to the bank to ask for a loan. Now imagine a mega-cap corporation – think Apple or Amazon – go to the same bank to ask for a similar size loan for a similar business idea. Who do you think the bank will charge the higher interest rate to? Obviously, the individual is a riskier loan candidate, and the bank will require a higher rate of return (via the interest rate on the loan) to make the loan. It is possible that equity investors see small cap companies the same way. They could be demanding a premium for the risk in investing in a smaller sized company instead of a well know mega-cap company. Other potential explanations involve concepts including how it can be challenging to trade small cap stocks (liquidity), and that most people work for mid and small companies and just don’t want more of that same risk (correlation with human capital).

Another way to access the size premium involves equally weighting companies in a broad-based index. Many of the most well-known indexes, such as the S&P 500, weight companies based on the size of their market cap. Larger companies like Apple, Tesla, and Amazon have larger weights than smaller firms in the index.² One way to create a size portfolio is to weight each company in a broad-based index equally. An ETF that tracks an equally weighted index such as the iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) will have more exposure to mid-cap companies than the broad index. This version of size investing allows the investor to gain exposure to the broad market, it invests in all parent universe securities, with different weights based on market-cap. Historically, this has tended to track a bit closer to the broad market compared to a pure size or multifactor approach.

A third option to investing in the size premium is investing in small cap securities that also have positive characteristics to other known style factors. One way to implement this strategy is through a small cap multifactor ETF, such as the iShares US Small Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF). This approach attempts to enhance small cap returns by emphasizing other characteristics like companies that have higher quality earnings or trade at a relative discount (value). By starting with a small cap benchmark, the investor can gain exposure to the size factor while also adding exposure to other historically rewarded factors all while controlling for risk relative to small cap benchmarks.

Size investing has several notable characteristics. Typically, these companies have more volatility. This is inherent in the nature of the companies. Smaller companies may have a smaller, less loyal customer base and shifting trends in the marketplace could disrupt their business models. Further, smaller companies tend to be more prone to distress during economic downturns.

Most of the academic literature for the size premium supports a risk-based explanation. Smaller firms are inherently riskier than their larger peers. They may be more sensitive to business cycle contractions and often have less diversified business models. They also are typically less liquid, causing investors to require a higher expected return for holding more illiquid securities.

Investors that have invested in smaller cap companies have been rewarded with higher returns over the long term.⁴ These higher returns were not a free lunch – they were compensation for bearing higher risk. For investors that are willing to take additional risk in their portfolios, they may be able to capture higher expected returns by investing in the size factor. Investors can proxy for the small size premium with an index fund that invests in small cap securities, through an equal weighted allocation to a broad market cap index, or via a multifactor ETF that invests in small cap securities.

There can be no assurance that performance will be enhanced or risk will be reduced for funds that seek to provide exposure to certain quantitative investment characteristics ("factors").  Exposure to such investment factors may detract from performance in some market environments, perhaps for extended periods. In such circumstances, a fund may seek to maintain exposure to the targeted investment factors and not adjust to target different factors, which could result in losses.